Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01177
Original file (PD 2012 01177.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX              CASE: PD-2012-01177
BRANCH OF SERVICE: AIR FORCE              BOARD DATE: 20140207
SEPARATION DATE: 20020917


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an Air National Guard TSGT/E-6 (3S111/Military Equal Opportunity
and Treatment Craftsman) serving in an Active Guard and Reserve (AGR) status, with over 8 years of active duty, medically separated for residual left knee instability status post (s/p) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair (1998) associated with chondromalacia. The CI first injured her left knee in 1988. Over the next few years, she was treated conservatively as well as by arthroscopy. Despite treatment, the left knee condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of her Air Force Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. She took a leave of absence from her AGR duties and was referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The MEB forwarded residual knee instability and chondromalacia to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AFI 48-123. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated the residual left knee instability s/p ACL repair (1998) associated with chondromalacia condition as unfitting, rated 10% citing criteria DoD and the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) guidelines. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “Since the original rating, my condition has continued to deteriorate to the point that in the past 6-8 months, I have fallen down stairs. My primary Care Doctors has ordered me a cane to use to assist with walking, and to cut down on the times I fall, whether it be on stairs, or just walking. Back approximately 2006/2007 timeframe, I had the 3-shot Synvisc shots given to me in my left knee. I again in Oct 2011 had the single shot Synvisc, which did more harm the help because it aggravated the knee. Currently I am seeing Dr. Mark Kircher, and he has ordered the 3-shot Synvisc to be given to me again on 6/8, 15, 22/2012. As time goes on my knee pain continues to hamper me and my ability to lead a normal life. I don't feel that any person should have to endure the pain and agony that accompanies me on a daily basis, just doing the small menial tasks around the house. Mowing my lawn is an all-day affair because I have to stop and rest because my knee is throbbing, just from walking behind the lawn mower, and mowing my yard. I have excruciating pain walking up stairs, so there for, if there is not an elevator in the building, it take me extra time to go up the stairs to get where I need to go. (this is a prime example of my home, bedrooms are on the second floor. We do not have an elevator in our house). I have sharp shooting pains if l get up and try to move to quickly, or if l switch directions my leg will give out. All of these common everyday things, that cause me to have difficulties with everyday living.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting left knee condition is addressed below; no additional conditions are within the Board’s defined DoDI 6040.44 purview. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.
The Board acknowledges the impairment with which the CI’s service-connected condition continues to burden her, but notes the Disability Evaluation System (DES) has neither the role nor the authority to compensate members for anticipated future severity or potential complications of conditions resulting in medical separation. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20020823
 VA - (Exam ~ 1 Mo. Pre-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Residual L Knee Instability S/P ACL Repair (1998) Associated w/ Chondromalacia 5257 10% DJD of the L Knee 5259 10% 20020823
No Additional MEB/PEB Entries
 Other x 7 20020823
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 30%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 21021 (most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] ).


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Left Knee Condition. As noted above, the CI injured her left knee in 1988 and was managed conservatively and by arthroscopy. The records for the latter procedure are not in evidence. On 15 February 2001, she had repeat arthroscopy for a torn medial meniscus of the left knee as seen on magnetic resonance imaging. At surgery, she was noted to have an intact ACL and lateral meniscus. She did have a small patellar plica (redundant synovial tissue), chondromalacia (degeneration of the cartilage) and a torn medial meniscus. The meniscus and chondromalacia were repaired. The remainder of the operative report was not in evidence. Efforts to obtain the missing records were not successful. The narrative summary was dated 16 July 2002, two months prior to separation. The CI reported limited function of her left leg and that it was unstable with difficulty with stairs and walking. The examiner noted that her height was 66 inches and weight was 199 pounds. She had some laxity of the left knee (not further specified) and limited range-of-motion (ROM) with pain, again not further specified. At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) examination performed on 23 August 2002, the CI reported that she used two separate braces, a “pull-on” and an “articulated” one. Neither locking nor laxity was reported, but she did endorse “giving way.” On examination, the knees were of equal circumference without effusion. The medial and lateral collateral ligaments were stable; slight laxity was noted on the ACL. The ROM of the left and right knee was normal, but with slight clicking on the left. However, at a second C&P examination on 25 October 2004, there was no ligamentous instability and testing of the ACL was normal. The ROM was reduced equally bilaterally secondary to body habitus.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB rated the left knee for residual instability at 10% using the code 5257, other impairment of the knee. The VA also rated the kneed at 10%, but used the coding option 5259, removal of the meniscus; this was later changed to 5010-5260, traumatic arthritis and limitation of flexion, at the 2004 rating decision, but kept at a 10% disability rating. The Board considered the findings and noted that the ROM was normal on the VA examination. She had painful motion and a partial meniscectomy. While the ACL was noted to be lax on the 2002 C&P, it was normal on the 2004 examination. The Board considered the different coding options available and found no route to a rating higher than the 10% adjudicated by both the PEB and VA. While the Board determined that the 5259 code utilized by the VA was more accurate, it does not recommend a change if there no advantage to the CI. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the back condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the knee condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Residual Left Knee Instability s/p ACL repair associated with chondromalacia 5257 10%
COMBINED 10%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120607, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record





XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review

SAF/MRB

 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Dear XXXXXXXXXXXXXX:

         Reference your application submitted under the provisions of DoDI 6040.44 (Title 10 U.S.C. §  1554a), PDBR Case Number PD-2012-01177.

         After careful consideration of your application and treatment records, the Physical Disability Board of Review determined that the rating assigned at the time of final disposition of your disability evaluation system processing was appropriate. Accordingly, the Board recommended no re-characterization or modification of your separation.

         I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board. I concur with that finding and their conclusion that re-characterization of your separation is not warranted. Accordingly, I accept their recommendation that your application be denied.

                                                               Sincerely,





 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
Attachment:
Record of Proceedings

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00629

    Original file (PD2012 00629.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The left knee PCL tear condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialtyor satisfy physical fitness standards.Hewas placed on limited duty andreferred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB).The MEB forwarded left knee PCL tear, surgically treated; left knee chondromalacia of the medial femoral condyle, surgically and medically treated; and left knee effusion, medically and surgically treated for Physical Evaluation Board...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00064

    Original file (PD 2014 00064.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The Board will consider the Category II condition as stated above, in its review of the unfitting right knee condition. Right Knee Condition .

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01984

    Original file (PD-2014-01984.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board deliberated on if the CI’s degree of instability with additional meniscal signs of catching and pain with knee degeneration warranted a “severe” 30% rating under 5257, or dual knee rating with additional rating under 5259 for meniscal symptoms (catching and pain)that did not overlap with ACL instability symptoms (instability). The prior to separation VA exam documented normal hand findings. Providing a correction to the individual’s separation document showing that the individual...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00514

    Original file (PD2009-00514.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Approximately one month after the CI separated from service he had surgery (20050518) to correct his ACL tear and lateral meniscus tear in his right knee. No evidence this condition was unfitting at the time of separation from service. After careful consideration of all available records the Board unanimously determined that the CI’s right knee condition is most appropriately rated at a combined 20% with 10% for 5259 Right Knee Medial and Lateral Meniscal Tear, s/p Repair of Medial...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01390

    Original file (PD-2013-01390.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Left Knee Condition . The range-of-motion (ROM) was flexion to 140 degrees (normal).There is one physical therapy note in the STR from September 2004 (after the NARSUM, 5 weeks prior to separation) which states “popping gone/clunking gone” (indicating pre-operative signs of loose cartilage had resolved); it also documents a normal gait with “mild” tenderness as the only positive finding, with nodocumentation of effusion, cartilage signs or instability.The VA Compensation and...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00135

    Original file (PD-2014-00135.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Any condition or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records. Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Pain/Instability Left Knee5099-500310%Left Knee Multi-Ligament Injury5010-525710%20070331Other x 0 (Not in Scope)Other x 0 (Not in Scope)20070331 Combined: 10%Combined: 10% *Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00096

    Original file (PD 2014 00096.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The left knee condition, characterized as “chondromalacia of patella,” “tear of medial cartilage or meniscus of knee,” “pain in joint involving lower leg” and “unspecified orthopedic aftercare” were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E. Post-SepFlexion (140 Normal)115105Extension (0 Normal)-0Commentantalgic gait; crepitus;painful motion; antalgic gait§4.71a Rating10%10%The Board directs attention to its rating recommendationbased on the above...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00013

    Original file (PD 2014 00013.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEWNAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE: PD-2014-00013BRANCH OF SERVICE: AIR FORCEBOARD DATE: 20140527 Bilateral Knee Pain w/Patellofemoral Chondromalacia s/p Bilateral Patellar Chondroplasty . Despite medications, her knee pain continued and she had an injection of the right knee on 23 October 2003.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01745

    Original file (PD-2014-01745.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Hyperlipidemia was submitted by the MEB as medically acceptable.The Informal PEBadjudicated “right knee pain” as unfitting at 10%, and “left knee pain” as unfitting at 10%, with likely application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). On PE of the knees, the left knee was normal in appearance. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00832

    Original file (PD2011-00832.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The FPEB and VA each coded the individual knees at 10% using the criteria for arthritis (5003), with the VA indicating a traumatic onset by using code 5010. Left Knee : With regards to the left knee, the Board considered that the preponderance of the record supported the 10% rating for the left knee for limited motion. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows: